Saham News
BBCA Shares Drop 2.25% as Foreign Investors Sell Rp419 Billion
/index.php
Berita Terkini - Posted on 09 September 2026 Reading time 5 minutes
Donald Trump wants a diplomatic breakthrough in Ukraine before his presidency ends.
Vladimir Putin says Russia is willing to keep talking.
But after an hour-long presidential phone call and a weekend of intensive American shuttle diplomacy, the hardest question remains unanswered: what terms could both Moscow and Kyiv actually accept?
Trump and Putin spoke on September 8, 2026, following visits to Moscow and Kyiv by U.S. envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner.
According to the Kremlin, the conversation focused on ending the war, restoring U.S.-Russia relations and identifying possible next steps for diplomacy.
No peace agreement emerged from the call.
Kremlin foreign-policy aide Yuri Ushakov said Trump emphasized that the conflict should be brought to an end as quickly as possible.
Ending the war, in Trump's view as described by Moscow, could create the conditions for Washington and Moscow to fully rebuild relations.
That could eventually include economic and trade ties.
Putin reportedly welcomed the approach.
The important caveat is that the detailed account of the phone call has so far come primarily from the Russian government.
U.S. officials had not provided an equally detailed public readout immediately after the conversation.
The call has sometimes been framed as Trump asking Putin for help.
That description is misleading.
According to Reuters' account of the Kremlin briefing, Putin told Trump what Russia believes the United States could do to help bring the conflict to an end.
Moscow did not disclose what those steps were.
There has been no public confirmation that they involve sanctions relief, territorial concessions, military aid or any other specific policy.
The safer conclusion is that the two presidents discussed what role Washington could play—not that Trump made a defined request for Russian assistance.
Ushakov said the conversation lasted exactly one hour and described it as constructive and candid.
A major focus was the diplomatic mission carried out only days earlier by Witkoff and Kushner.
The U.S. envoys first met Putin in Moscow and then traveled to Kyiv for discussions with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
Both Trump and Putin viewed the mission positively, according to the Kremlin.
But a positive diplomatic assessment is not the same as an agreement.
The Witkoff-Kushner mission was designed to revive negotiations that had largely stalled.
Trump said before their trip that Washington had a new idea for peace but did not publicly disclose its contents.
In Moscow, the envoys held lengthy discussions with Putin.
They then traveled to Kyiv, where they met Zelenskyy and Ukrainian officials along with European security representatives.
Ukraine's presidential office said the talks covered security guarantees, postwar reconstruction and the possibility of creating a durable peace framework.
Kushner also discussed efforts to arrange a trilateral negotiating format.
Zelenskyy later said the U.S. envoys had presented several worthwhile ideas.
He declined to make them public while negotiations continued.
Ukrainian, American and European representatives are expected to hold further discussions before another possible trilateral meeting.
Turkey, the United Arab Emirates and Switzerland are among the countries mentioned as possible hosts.
Potential topics include grain shipments, energy infrastructure and prisoner exchanges.
Kyiv says it is willing to discuss compromises but insists negotiations must produce concrete results.
Diplomacy ultimately runs into the battlefield map.
The biggest unresolved issue remains territory in eastern Ukraine.
Russia wants control over the remaining Ukrainian-held areas of Donetsk, a region Moscow claims as Russian territory.
Ukraine rejects demands that it surrender land its military still controls.
Around 15%–20% of Donetsk remains outside Russian control.
Russian forces are moving toward the key eastern cities of Sloviansk and Kramatorsk, but their advances remain relatively slow.
For Putin, capturing the remainder of Donetsk would represent a major strategic victory.
For Kyiv, losing the area would seriously weaken its eastern defensive network.
That makes compromise exceptionally difficult.
The revived negotiations are unfolding while both militaries continue to fight.
A temporary reduction in attacks occurred around the U.S. envoys' visit.
But Russia resumed major missile and drone attacks on Kyiv after the delegation departed.
The September 8 strikes killed civilians and injured dozens.
Ukraine continues its own long-range attacks against targets inside Russia.
This contrast is important.
Diplomacy has restarted, but there is not yet a durable ceasefire.
The Kremlin said Putin gave Trump his assessment of military conditions during the call.
It did not disclose the full details.
Russian officials have repeatedly portrayed their forces as holding the initiative.
Independent military assessments are more cautious.
Russia is continuing to advance in parts of Donetsk, but analysts say Moscow has yet to achieve a decisive strategic breakthrough.
The distinction matters because battlefield confidence can shape how much either side is willing to compromise.
A party that believes time is on its side has less incentive to make major concessions.
Trump and Putin did identify one area where progress may be more achievable.
They agreed on the importance of continuing prisoner exchanges.
Ukraine has also called for prisoner-of-war swaps to become larger and faster.
Humanitarian exchanges are politically easier than resolving questions of borders, NATO membership or postwar security.
They may therefore provide an early test of whether the renewed diplomacy can deliver measurable outcomes.
The Kremlin's account also emphasized economics.
Trump reportedly argued that ending the war could unlock major opportunities for renewed U.S.-Russia trade and economic cooperation.
Relations have been heavily constrained since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 and the expansion of Western sanctions.
A future settlement could potentially change that environment.
But any economic normalization would depend on the terms of peace, U.S. sanctions policy, allied decisions and Moscow's compliance with whatever agreement emerges.
For now, better economic relations are a potential incentive for peace—not a confirmed outcome.
The Russian president also told Trump that Moscow has no aggressive intentions toward Europe, according to the Kremlin.
Russian officials argue that warnings about a Russian threat are used by European governments to justify larger defense budgets and stronger military support for Ukraine.
Many European governments strongly reject that interpretation and regard Russia as a major security threat.
Putin's statement should therefore be understood as the Russian government's position rather than an independently established assessment of Moscow's future intentions.
Despite renewed diplomacy, there is still no publicly agreed framework resolving the major disputes.
Territory remains unresolved.
So do Ukraine's future security guarantees, its relationship with NATO and the status of Western sanctions.
The role of European countries in any settlement also remains important.
These are not details that can be solved by rhetoric alone.
They are the core political questions that have blocked previous peace efforts.
The significance of the Trump-Putin call is therefore procedural rather than transformational.
High-level U.S.-Russia communication is active again.
American negotiators are traveling between Moscow and Kyiv.
Ukraine says new ideas are being discussed.
Prisoner exchanges remain on the table.
And another negotiating round may follow.
None of that means peace is imminent.
But diplomacy has moved from a largely stalled phase back into active engagement.
Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin held an hour-long phone call on September 8 focused on ending Russia's war in Ukraine.
According to the Kremlin, Trump wants a rapid settlement that could allow U.S.-Russia relations and economic ties to recover.
Putin, meanwhile, outlined what Moscow believes Washington could do to help bring the war to an end, though the details were not disclosed.
The conversation followed a diplomatic mission by Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner to both Moscow and Kyiv.
Those talks generated new proposals but no breakthrough.
Territory in Donetsk remains a major obstacle, fighting continues, and the broader security settlement is unresolved.
The latest call therefore represents a reopening of high-level diplomacy—not evidence that a peace agreement is already close.
Source: cnbcindonesia.com
What do you think about this topic? Tell us what you think. Don't forget to follow Digivestasi's Instagram, TikTok, Youtube accounts to keep you updated with the latest information about economics, finance, digital technology and digital asset investment.
DISCLAIMER
All information contained on our website is summarized from reliable sources and published in good faith and for the purpose of providing general information only. Any action taken by readers on information from this site is their own responsibility.